In India’s ever-evolving motorcycle market, two machines often spark passionate debates among enthusiasts: the Kawasaki Ninja 300 and the TVS Apache RR 310. Both bikes boast aggressive styling, strong performance, and a certain track-inspired DNA. But how do they truly compare when you put them side-by-side—not just on paper, but in terms of real-world riding dynamics and intent?
Let’s take a closer look.
Engine & Performance – Twin vs Single
At the heart of the Kawasaki Ninja 300 is a 296cc parallel-twin engine. It revs high, sounds smooth, and delivers power in a linear fashion. The twin-cylinder setup allows for better top-end performance, making it ideal for highway cruising and track sprints. The Ninja 300 produces 39 PS of power and 26.1 Nm of torque, mated to a slick 6-speed gearbox with a slipper clutch.
On the other hand, the Apache RR 310 is powered by a 312.2cc single-cylinder engine, developed in collaboration with BMW Motorrad. It churns out 34 PS and 27.3 Nm, also paired with a 6-speed gearbox and slipper clutch. While not as smooth as the Ninja’s twin-cylinder mill, the Apache’s motor delivers punchy mid-range performance and enough grunt to keep up with bigger bikes on twisty roads.
Track Geometry and Riding Posture
When it comes to handling, the Ninja 300 carries its track roots subtly. The riding position is sporty but not aggressive, making it more forgiving during city rides and longer tours. Its chassis feels stable at high speeds, but it lacks the sharper edge needed for serious corner carving.
The Apache RR 310, however, leans deeper into its track persona. Its clip-on handlebars, higher rear-set footpegs, and sharper rake give it a more committed riding stance. Built on a trellis frame, the RR 310 feels nimble in corners and more eager to tip into lean angles. For those who occasionally hit the track, this bike delivers a more immersive experience.
Braking and Suspension
Both bikes are equipped with dual-channel ABS for safety, but their braking characteristics differ. The Ninja uses conventional telescopic forks and a rear mono-shock, tuned more for comfort than outright sportiness.
The Apache RR 310, however, gets USD forks up front (thanks to its BMW-derived platform) and an adjustable rear mono-shock. The suspension feels firmer, more responsive, and is better suited to aggressive riding, especially on smoother surfaces like racetracks.
Features and Electronics
Where the Apache truly shines is in its electronics and features. It offers ride modes, dual-channel ABS with different calibration, a TFT instrument console, and connected tech. These are features unheard of in this price bracket not too long ago.
The Ninja 300, in contrast, sticks to a more traditional analogue-digital console and lacks modern electronics. While some purists may prefer the analog tachometer, others might find the lack of features surprising at its price point.
Price and Value
While exact pricing varies by region and offers, the Ninja 300 usually commands a premium, largely due to being a CKD (Completely Knocked Down) import. The Apache RR 310, manufactured locally, undercuts it in pricing while offering more equipment for the money.
Also Read:- Kawasaki Ninja ZX-4RR vs Yamaha R3 – Which Supersport Offers More Value?
Verdict – Different Paths to Thrill
Both the Kawasaki Ninja 300 and the TVS Apache RR 310 cater to riders who crave performance and visual flair. The Ninja 300 is for those who want a smooth, twin-cylinder experience with subtle dynamics and refined power delivery. The Apache RR 310, on the other hand, is for the tech-savvy rider who wants aggressive styling, cutting-edge features, and a motorcycle that feels at home on twisties and track days alike.
At the end of the day, it’s not about which one is better—it’s about which one speaks your language as a rider.
