In the ever-growing segment of retro-styled commuter bikes, two names have emerged as strong contenders: the Yamaha FZ-X and Royal Enfield Hunter 350.
Both bikes cater to urban riders seeking a classic look with modern practicality. But which of the two actually delivers better value for the average Indian commuter? Let’s take a closer look.
Styling and Design
Both bikes flaunt neo-retro charm, but they do so in very different ways.
The Yamaha FZ-X features a rugged urban scrambler-inspired design with a high-set handlebar, a round LED headlamp with DRLs, and metal accents. Its design feels purpose-built for the city and occasional off-road patches.
On the other hand, the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 sticks closer to a retro roadster theme. Its minimalist fuel tank, classic round headlamp, and upright posture speak the language of timeless motorcycling. Compared to the FZ-X, the Hunter looks more mature and carries the Royal Enfield legacy in its design.
Engine and Performance
Here’s where things begin to get very different.
The Yamaha FZ-X is powered by a 149cc air-cooled single-cylinder engine producing around 12.4 PS and 13.3 Nm. It’s tuned for urban agility rather than high-speed thrills. The engine is refined and fuel-efficient, perfect for city commuters.
The Hunter 350, in contrast, packs a 349cc air-cooled engine that produces 20.2 PS and 27 Nm of torque. It’s heavier but significantly more powerful, giving it an edge on highways and longer rides. While not blisteringly fast, the Hunter offers a calm, torquey ride with a thumping feel that many riders appreciate.
Ride and Handling
Yamaha’s FZ-X offers nimble handling thanks to its lightweight frame and upright seating position. It’s comfortable for short and medium-distance commutes, and the suspension setup handles potholes with ease.
The Hunter 350 feels heavier in comparison, but surprisingly agile for a Royal Enfield. With 17-inch wheels and a relatively short wheelbase, the Hunter feels more planted at high speeds than expected. However, city maneuverability isn’t as effortless as the FZ-X.
Features and Technology
In terms of features, the Yamaha FZ-X offers:
- Fully digital instrument cluster
- Bluetooth connectivity
- Side-stand engine cut-off
- LED lighting
The Hunter 350, particularly in the Metro variant, offers:
- Dual-channel ABS
- Semi-digital instrument console
- Tripper navigation (optional)
While Yamaha goes slightly ahead with Bluetooth integration and modern touches, Royal Enfield focuses more on the mechanical experience and safety features like dual-channel ABS.
Price and Value
- Yamaha FZ-X price starts around ₹1.37 lakh (ex-showroom)
- Hunter 350 starts at ₹1.50 lakh and goes up to ₹1.75 lakh depending on the variant
The FZ-X clearly wins in affordability. It also brings in better mileage—hovering around 45-50 kmpl—whereas the Hunter gives about 35-40 kmpl, depending on riding style.
Also Read:- Yamaha RX100 Electric Digital Render Goes Viral – Fans React to Modern Twist
Verdict – Which One Makes More Sense?
It all comes down to what you expect from your motorcycle.
- If you’re looking for a lightweight, fuel-efficient city commuter with a funky, retro-inspired design and a host of features, the Yamaha FZ-X is hard to beat. It’s beginner-friendly, budget-conscious, and built for daily city life.
- But if your heart leans toward classic motorcycling with more power, a torquey engine, and occasional long rides, the Hunter 350 is the more satisfying choice. Despite being slightly more expensive, it offers a more substantial riding experience.
In short, the Yamaha FZ-X is for the practical commuter, while the Hunter 350 appeals to the emotional rider who values character and presence.
